Vintage Starship

Vintage Starship Sherlock, Star Trek, Harry Potter, humor, and other shiny things that catch my eye.

I'm pretty minimalist, and only post/reblog things that make me laugh out loud or give me outrageous feels.

Questions/Comments/Concerns/Demands/Random Trivia I Should Know: send it my way.

Reblogged from wilwheaton

wilwheaton:

jenniferdeguzman:

He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise.

mechcanuck:

I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW 

The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies.

Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that.

(Source: catbushandludicrous)

wilwheaton:

I can’t find the original source, but it’s too good not to share.
(seen in r/StarTrek)

Reblogged from wilwheaton

wilwheaton:

I can’t find the original source, but it’s too good not to share.

(seen in r/StarTrek)

Reblogged from punkmonksteven

(Source: coolstoryfuckface)

Reblogged from punkmonksteven

(Source: togifs)

Reblogged from outlander5

grantaire-dont-care:

dancing queen

young and sweet

only sewenteen

image

Reblogged from punkmonksteven

(Source: ForGIFs.com)

Reblogged from finnemores

Star Trek Movie Posters by Matt Ferguson

For Crome Yellow’s Reel Rewind, reviewing all six of the OG Star Trek films.

Artist: Behance / Website / Twittercifi

(Source: ianbrooks)

outlander5:

Schindler’s Shit

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Shit

Reblogged from outlander5

outlander5:

Schindler’s Shit

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Shit

Reblogged from outlander5

thefrogman:

I believe that there are a small group of women who hate men just for being men. I believe that the textbook definition of the word misandry fits that description. I believe there are bad things that happen to men. I believe those issues should be addressed. I do not believe that a fringe group of women who hate men can be blamed for those issues. 
Misandry was a dead word until recently. A group of men who feared the progress of feminism revived the word and used it to undercut the movement. They like having the power being a man provides and they don’t want to lose that. So they created a movement, found a bunch of legitimate issues that affect men, and tried to blame women for those issues. They called this misandry. It’s like conservatives using buzzwords like “death panels” to make people fear health care. They let people assume it meant Obama wanted to kill your grandma. They let their cute little phrase infect the minds of good people and convince them of falsehoods. 
People are telling me that men cannot report rape without getting laughed at. They say this is misandry. It is the fault of women who hate men. But that just doesn’t make any sense to me. When I seek a logical explanation, it seems more likely that this is because men are supposed to be strong and women are supposed to be weak. And rape has been viewed as something that happens mostly to women. So if it does happen to a man, they must be weak. How did this idea of men=strong and women=weak start? I’m pretty sure it wasn’t because of misandry. It is an ancient patriarchy collapsing in on itself. 
Feminism is about fighting inequality. It’s about erasing the strong/weak perception ingrained into our society. Misandry, as the term is often used today, is about trying to blame women for anything bad that happens to men.
If you want to fight to fix issues that affect men, go for it. But I would really consider distancing yourself from this term. It is used to evangelize folks into a movement that is very problematic. A group that can’t handle scrutiny of their comic books and video games, so they send death and rape threats. A group that calls women sluts and think they ask for rape if they show too much cleavage. Those are the people who coined this term, and you should want nothing to do with them or their language.

Reblogged from thefrogman

thefrogman:

I believe that there are a small group of women who hate men just for being men. I believe that the textbook definition of the word misandry fits that description. I believe there are bad things that happen to men. I believe those issues should be addressed. I do not believe that a fringe group of women who hate men can be blamed for those issues. 

Misandry was a dead word until recently. A group of men who feared the progress of feminism revived the word and used it to undercut the movement. They like having the power being a man provides and they don’t want to lose that. So they created a movement, found a bunch of legitimate issues that affect men, and tried to blame women for those issues. They called this misandry. It’s like conservatives using buzzwords like “death panels” to make people fear health care. They let people assume it meant Obama wanted to kill your grandma. They let their cute little phrase infect the minds of good people and convince them of falsehoods. 

People are telling me that men cannot report rape without getting laughed at. They say this is misandry. It is the fault of women who hate men. But that just doesn’t make any sense to me. When I seek a logical explanation, it seems more likely that this is because men are supposed to be strong and women are supposed to be weak. And rape has been viewed as something that happens mostly to women. So if it does happen to a man, they must be weak. How did this idea of men=strong and women=weak start? I’m pretty sure it wasn’t because of misandry. It is an ancient patriarchy collapsing in on itself. 

Feminism is about fighting inequality. It’s about erasing the strong/weak perception ingrained into our society. Misandry, as the term is often used today, is about trying to blame women for anything bad that happens to men.

If you want to fight to fix issues that affect men, go for it. But I would really consider distancing yourself from this term. It is used to evangelize folks into a movement that is very problematic. A group that can’t handle scrutiny of their comic books and video games, so they send death and rape threats. A group that calls women sluts and think they ask for rape if they show too much cleavage. Those are the people who coined this term, and you should want nothing to do with them or their language.

outlander5:

you should have tried harder

Reblogged from outlander5

outlander5:

you should have tried harder

(Source: memewhore)

Reblogged from yousaytwilightisayharrypotter

googlehomie:

hey man I haven’t heard anything from Beethoven in a while is he on hiatus or something

(Source: slydigger)

Reblogged from outlander5

leonardhchekov:

That biology? original gifs here

Reblogged from outlander5

green-blooded-computer:

survivor-trek:

trekgate:

Spock and Profanity

just wait til he discovers the word fuck

the hell he will.

pleatedjeans:

via

Reblogged from pleatedjeans

pleatedjeans:

via